Module 04 · Agentic Engineering
Agentic Engineering is the systematic organisation and control of multi-step work in which a model uses tools, maintains state and produces evidence for verification and acceptance.
Learning question. How can an agentic work trajectory remain controlled, inspectable and recoverable?
Scope
The object of engineering is the complete trajectory of observations, intermediate decisions, tool calls, state changes and feedback. A model, its harness and the surrounding environment form the effective system. The harness supplies technical controls; responsibility for scholarly or organisational adequacy remains with the authorised role.
- Distinguish model, harness, agent, tools, state and environment by function.
- Bound a multi-step task through permissions, reversible increments, stopping conditions and observable checks.
- Integrate delegated evidence into maintained project knowledge and an explicit acceptance decision.
Concepts
- Task and working contextdefine the purpose, material, constraints and current state.
- Model, harness and environmentcombine interpretation with tools, files, permissions and executable feedback.
- Execution loopobserves, plans a bounded step, acts, inspects the result and updates the approach.
- Evidencecomes from tool output, tests, validators, source comparison and independent review.
- Intervention and acceptancereturn consequential or uncertain decisions to the responsible role.
- Write-backplaces durable findings in the responsible knowledge and project artefacts.
Starter sequence
1. Treat capability as a compound system
An observed result depends on the model, the supplied context, the harness and the environment. Comparing models alone leaves tools, permissions, state and feedback outside the analysis.
2. Engineer the action and feedback loop
A controlled loop registers the current state, selects one bounded action, observes its consequence and revises the next step. The final artefact is only one part of the evidence.
3. Set permissions and reversibility
Tool access follows the least-privilege principle. Source material stays protected, generated outputs remain confined to an authorised workspace and publication actions require explicit release.
4. Assign information to the right mechanism
Persistent instruction files carry recurring project rules. Skills package reusable procedures. Model Context Protocol resources connect tools and data. Each mechanism has its own discovery, permission and maintenance boundary.
5. Delegate bounded work
A Subagent receives a defined question, source frame and return format. Parallel sessions and Worktrees isolate contexts and file changes. The parent trajectory integrates evidence and resolves disagreement.
6. Preserve evidence through write-back
Promptotyping links implementation to documented project knowledge, verification and acceptance. Research Mission Control adds explicit authority, bounded lanes and evidence-mapped integration.
Learning routes
Available · local tutorial
Claude Code introduction
A product-specific route through persistent instructions, tools, Skills, Plugins, Subagents, Worktrees and visual verification.
Available · local tutorial
Codex introduction
A product-specific route through installation, project instructions, Skills, delegated work, Worktrees and observable verification.
Available · local tutorial
Pi introduction
A product-specific route that distinguishes the locally running harness from its model provider and inference location.
Available · external method
Research Mission Control
The public repository documents accountable orchestration through Research Director, Research and Operations roles.
Available · external method
Promptotyping
The method connects maintained project knowledge, agentic implementation, verification, acceptance and write-back.
Curated Skills
These externally maintained MIT-licensed examples show distinct procedural functions. Every entry is presented as a reference. Its complete instructions, side effects and permission scope still require a KCE review before any recommendation or installation.
-
grill-with-docsClarifies a plan through a structured interview while maintaining shared terminology and decision records.
- Invocation
- User-invoked
- Compatibility
- Claude Code plugin; Codex and compatible agents through editable skill files
- Write scope
- Project domain document and architecture decision records
- Review status
- Reference · instruction and permission review pending
-
researchInvestigates one bounded question against high-trust primary sources and returns a cited repository artefact.
- Invocation
- Model-invoked
- Compatibility
- Claude Code plugin; Codex and compatible agents through editable skill files
- Write scope
- One cited Markdown result at the task-authorised repository path
- Review status
- Reference · instruction and permission review pending
-
domain-modelingTests project vocabulary against edge cases and updates the responsible domain and decision artefacts.
- Invocation
- Model-invoked
- Compatibility
- Claude Code plugin; Codex and compatible agents through editable skill files
- Write scope
- Project domain document and architecture decision records
- Review status
- Reference · instruction and permission review pending
-
diagnosing-bugsBuilds an observable failing condition, minimises it, tests hypotheses and closes with a regression check.
- Invocation
- Model-invoked
- Compatibility
- Claude Code plugin; Codex and compatible agents through editable skill files
- Write scope
- Task-bounded instrumentation, fix and regression test
- Review status
- Reference · instruction and permission review pending
-
tddConstrains a feature or fix through a red-green-refactor loop implemented in small vertical slices.
- Invocation
- Model-invoked
- Compatibility
- Claude Code plugin; Codex and compatible agents through editable skill files
- Write scope
- Task-bounded tests and implementation
- Review status
- Reference · instruction and permission review pending
-
code-reviewCompares a diff independently with repository standards and the originating specification.
- Invocation
- Model-invoked
- Compatibility
- Claude Code plugin; Codex and compatible agents through editable skill files
- Write scope
- Review evidence; implementation changes require a separate authorised task
- Review status
- Reference · instruction and permission review pending
-
handoffCompacts a working conversation into an explicit state transfer that another agent can continue.
- Invocation
- User-invoked
- Compatibility
- Claude Code plugin; Codex and compatible agents through editable skill files
- Write scope
- One handoff document at the configured project location
- Review status
- Reference · instruction and permission review pending
-
writing-for-agentsStructures persistent instructions and skill documents for reliable discovery, retrieval and use.
- Invocation
- Model-invoked
- Compatibility
- Claude Code plugin; Codex and compatible agents through editable skill files
- Write scope
- Task-authorised agent instruction and skill documents
- Review status
- Reference · instruction and permission review pending
External collection status: maintained outside KCE, MIT licence, checked 25 August 2026. The source repository supports a managed Claude Code plugin and editable installation for Codex and other compatible agents.
Teaching material
The Full Slide Deck provides the reference structure. The Full Lecture Notes provide the expanded explanation and literature route.
Videos
The current maintained playlist contains 22 videos whose primary teaching function belongs to Module 04. This starter list preserves playlist order.
Workshops
All seven registered workshops include Module 04. These three instances show different uses of controlled agentic work.
- Making Estate Materials Digitally AccessibleResearch-data workflow and an available five-unit Web Module.
- Knowledge, Context and Agentic Engineering for Research Data Workflows & Digital EditionsSource-bound transcription, structured extraction and scholarly verification.
- HEDIT KI-Workshop 2026Agentic engineering for digital scholarly editions and participant material.
